Who won this case? Was she fired for complaining?
November 10, 2008 by Sam NarisiPosted in: Discrimination, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, Terminations
Retaliation claims cause huge headaches for employers — especially when employees may be raising frivolous complaints just to protect themselves.
Read the facts of this real-life case and decide: Who won?
The facts:
An African-American employee helped conduct interviews to hire a new member of her department. One of the candidates was an African-American woman that she recommended. However, the manager hired a white applicant who was more qualified, and the employee complained that the selection was biased. A few months later, the employee was fired due to performance problems.
The employer said:
The woman was fired because of documented performance problems — any complaint she made had nothing to do with it.
Who won the case?
Answer: The employer.
Why: In retaliation cases, companies can still be on the hook even if they prove an employee’s initial complaints were invalid. If the employee believes he or she was making a legitimate legal complaint, and the company retaliates, the employer will likely lose in court.
But that doesn’t mean an employee can claim retaliation based on just any frivolous complaint. According to the court, employees must have an “objectively reasonable” belief that they’re raising a valid concern.
In this case, the employee had no basis for believing the company had discriminated, so her retaliation claim didn’t fly. The case was thrown out.
Cite: Coleman v. Loudoun County School Board
Tags: complaints, retaliation

November 12th, 2008 at 10:08 am
Can an employer eliminate overtime for only certain employees? Stated reason being to reduce business costs… but only a few employees OT was reduced or eliminated. Is this fair?
November 12th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
There must be legitimate reasons and a clearly defined overtime policy. For instance, if you want to cut down on costs you can require that all overtime must be approved by a supervisor. For certain departments and their budgets, it will mean that say finance will not have any overtime. But in order to keep up with demand of product, you may need to approve overtime for your production workers. It can be viewed as discrimination, however, if you have 10 people doing the same job (produciton or otherwise) and 4 of them are approved to work overtime but the other 6 are not.
Keep in mind that you must pay overtime if someone has worked it. It becomes a performance issue, then, if the employee repeatedly disregards the approval policy. All occurences must be documented and you must keep detailed records if you intend to punish someone for misuse of this policy.
November 13th, 2008 at 10:19 am
What does the OT have to do with case?