Comments on: Who won this case: “The plant’s closed but you still need to pay me” http://www.hrlegalnews.com/who-won-this-case-%e2%80%9cthe-plant%e2%80%99s-closed-but-you-still-need-to-pay-me%e2%80%9d/ Up-to-the-minute cases and law impacting HR Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:01:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: debbie http://www.hrlegalnews.com/who-won-this-case-%e2%80%9cthe-plant%e2%80%99s-closed-but-you-still-need-to-pay-me%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-3276 debbie Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:35:55 +0000 http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=33#comment-3276 How did the company learn that some of its former employees had new jobs? I assume the company continued to pay other former employees who, unbeknownst to their former employer, may have also found new jobs. How did the company learn that some of its former employees had new jobs? I assume the company continued to pay other former employees who, unbeknownst to their former employer, may have also found new jobs.

]]> By: debra http://www.hrlegalnews.com/who-won-this-case-%e2%80%9cthe-plant%e2%80%99s-closed-but-you-still-need-to-pay-me%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-100 debra Wed, 07 May 2008 20:58:15 +0000 http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=33#comment-100 Wow. I was totally wrong on this one. I would have thought the employees would keep getting the money for 60 days (as promised). Wow. I was totally wrong on this one. I would have thought the employees would keep getting the money for 60 days (as promised).

]]>