<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: While she was on leave, company decided her job could be eliminated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrlegalnews.com/while-she-was-on-fmla-company-decided-her-job-wasnt-necessary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/while-she-was-on-fmla-company-decided-her-job-wasnt-necessary/</link>
	<description>Up-to-the-minute cases and law impacting HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:01:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. B.</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/while-she-was-on-fmla-company-decided-her-job-wasnt-necessary/comment-page-1/#comment-1993</link>
		<dc:creator>R. B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=245#comment-1993</guid>
		<description>Tammy, you would need to talk with an attorney because the details of your situation really matter. For example, you don&#039;t really say if this was an on-the-job injury, how long you had been with the company (did you even qualify for FMLA?), what state you live in and some things like that which could factor into the legality of your employer&#039;s actions.  But basically, if your position would have been eliminated regardless of whether you went on leave or not, the company didn&#039;t do anything wrong.  I would have tried to see if there was another position where you would fit that was close to your original position, but if quite a few people were laid off during that time, there may not have been other position for you to move to.  Companies are not required to create positions for returning employees during a downturn when a workforce reduction is a business necessity.  If your job would have been eliminated anyway and the leave didn&#039;t factor into the justification for the layoff, they probably didn&#039;t do anything wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tammy, you would need to talk with an attorney because the details of your situation really matter. For example, you don&#8217;t really say if this was an on-the-job injury, how long you had been with the company (did you even qualify for FMLA?), what state you live in and some things like that which could factor into the legality of your employer&#8217;s actions.  But basically, if your position would have been eliminated regardless of whether you went on leave or not, the company didn&#8217;t do anything wrong.  I would have tried to see if there was another position where you would fit that was close to your original position, but if quite a few people were laid off during that time, there may not have been other position for you to move to.  Companies are not required to create positions for returning employees during a downturn when a workforce reduction is a business necessity.  If your job would have been eliminated anyway and the leave didn&#8217;t factor into the justification for the layoff, they probably didn&#8217;t do anything wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/while-she-was-on-fmla-company-decided-her-job-wasnt-necessary/comment-page-1/#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=245#comment-1992</guid>
		<description>Help!

I was injured and placed on STD by my doctor for 2.5 months. I worked as an administrative assistant to the president/ceo and was 1 of 3 administrative assistants. I had the lowest time on the job, however, the third admin., was only part-time and transferred from another location because of problems in the other office with co-workers. My company was in the middle of hiring a new president/ceo and once that person was placed in the position (the day of my injury) she laid off approx., 30 people prior to my return.  Once I returned my position was ended 30 minutes upon my return to work. I returned on a Monday, therefore it had been decided that my position would be eliminated prior to my return.  I really do believe that my rights were violated. Since then my finances have not been the same. Selling my home (short sale). I can&#039;t seem to secure another administrative position at the same wages unless, I relocate or commute to another city. 

Please help.... Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help!</p>
<p>I was injured and placed on STD by my doctor for 2.5 months. I worked as an administrative assistant to the president/ceo and was 1 of 3 administrative assistants. I had the lowest time on the job, however, the third admin., was only part-time and transferred from another location because of problems in the other office with co-workers. My company was in the middle of hiring a new president/ceo and once that person was placed in the position (the day of my injury) she laid off approx., 30 people prior to my return.  Once I returned my position was ended 30 minutes upon my return to work. I returned on a Monday, therefore it had been decided that my position would be eliminated prior to my return.  I really do believe that my rights were violated. Since then my finances have not been the same. Selling my home (short sale). I can&#8217;t seem to secure another administrative position at the same wages unless, I relocate or commute to another city. </p>
<p>Please help&#8230;. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/while-she-was-on-fmla-company-decided-her-job-wasnt-necessary/comment-page-1/#comment-1842</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=245#comment-1842</guid>
		<description>ChereneB,

I think you&#039;re making a couple of (inaccurate) assumptions.  1) That STD is 26 weeks.  Many STD plans are 13 weeks or some other duration.  2) That an employer must keep an employee&#039;s position open for the duration of a STD LOA, even if it is in excess of FMLA regs (if FMLA applies to the employe).  

Sheila Denton,  be careful if you are proceeding based on CherenB&#039;s comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ChereneB,</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re making a couple of (inaccurate) assumptions.  1) That STD is 26 weeks.  Many STD plans are 13 weeks or some other duration.  2) That an employer must keep an employee&#8217;s position open for the duration of a STD LOA, even if it is in excess of FMLA regs (if FMLA applies to the employe).  </p>
<p>Sheila Denton,  be careful if you are proceeding based on CherenB&#8217;s comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChereneB</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/while-she-was-on-fmla-company-decided-her-job-wasnt-necessary/comment-page-1/#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>ChereneB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=245#comment-1682</guid>
		<description>Even if you have exhausted your FMLA leave, if you were on Short Term Disability in conjunction with the leave you would have until the end of the 26 weeks.  If you could not return at the end of that time period then your employer would have the option to suspend or terminate.  This should have been explained in detail to you when you were hired and when you were approved the leave.

If the employer offers LTD then you would need to find out the restrictions, time limits, etc. of that leave which again should have been explained to you in benefits orientation and when it was approved. 

Make sure that you haven&#039;t signed off on something that you didn&#039;t really understand upon employment.  If you did then there is not much that the employer would be held liable for.  However, it is still best to consult with an attorney as R. B. stated if you feel that something has been done illegally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if you have exhausted your FMLA leave, if you were on Short Term Disability in conjunction with the leave you would have until the end of the 26 weeks.  If you could not return at the end of that time period then your employer would have the option to suspend or terminate.  This should have been explained in detail to you when you were hired and when you were approved the leave.</p>
<p>If the employer offers LTD then you would need to find out the restrictions, time limits, etc. of that leave which again should have been explained to you in benefits orientation and when it was approved. </p>
<p>Make sure that you haven&#8217;t signed off on something that you didn&#8217;t really understand upon employment.  If you did then there is not much that the employer would be held liable for.  However, it is still best to consult with an attorney as R. B. stated if you feel that something has been done illegally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. B.</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/while-she-was-on-fmla-company-decided-her-job-wasnt-necessary/comment-page-1/#comment-1677</link>
		<dc:creator>R. B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=245#comment-1677</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not an attorney and you give very little information in your posting, but in general, it would really depend on how long you have been on leave.  If your employer is large enough, FMLA provides you with job protection of up to 12 weeks (unpaid) if you have worked for a minimum of 1 year / 1250 hours for that employer.  If you have been off for more than 12 weeks of accumulated time since the FMLA leave began, they would be within their rights to terminate you.  But again, this is just general information that may or may not apply to your specific case.  If you really feel they have done something illegal, you should consult with an attorney who can review all the details and better advise you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not an attorney and you give very little information in your posting, but in general, it would really depend on how long you have been on leave.  If your employer is large enough, FMLA provides you with job protection of up to 12 weeks (unpaid) if you have worked for a minimum of 1 year / 1250 hours for that employer.  If you have been off for more than 12 weeks of accumulated time since the FMLA leave began, they would be within their rights to terminate you.  But again, this is just general information that may or may not apply to your specific case.  If you really feel they have done something illegal, you should consult with an attorney who can review all the details and better advise you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila Denton</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/while-she-was-on-fmla-company-decided-her-job-wasnt-necessary/comment-page-1/#comment-1671</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Denton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=245#comment-1671</guid>
		<description>I have a question---

I have been out on FMLA, SDS and not LDL.  I was diagnosised wit Colon Cancer in may and have been going through Chemo since.  I work for a Medical Center/Hospital.  On September 30, I received a phone call from the HR department stating that they were terminating me due to they decided not to extend my personal leave.  Even with my doctor&#039;s note-- Can they legally do this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question&#8212;</p>
<p>I have been out on FMLA, SDS and not LDL.  I was diagnosised wit Colon Cancer in may and have been going through Chemo since.  I work for a Medical Center/Hospital.  On September 30, I received a phone call from the HR department stating that they were terminating me due to they decided not to extend my personal leave.  Even with my doctor&#8217;s note&#8211; Can they legally do this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

