<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HRLegalNews.com &#187; suits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrlegalnews.com/tag/suits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com</link>
	<description>Up-to-the-minute cases and law impacting HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Courts make managers pay (literally) for mistakes</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/courts-tell-managers-to-pay-literally-for-mistakes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/courts-tell-managers-to-pay-literally-for-mistakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recent Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
If you need to give managers another reason to pay attention during legal training, this one might do the trick.   
It&#8217;s the new trend in employment lawsuits: personal liability. Seems like making companies shell out the big bucks wasn&#8217;t enough, so courts have started dipping their hands into individual managers&#8217; pockets, too.
The thinking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-116" title="gavel" src="http://www.hrlegalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/gavel.jpg" alt="" width="360" height="200" /></p>
<p>If you need to give managers another reason to pay attention during legal training, this one might do the trick.   <span id="more-99"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s the new trend in employment lawsuits: personal liability. Seems like making companies shell out the big bucks wasn&#8217;t enough, so courts have started dipping their hands into individual managers&#8217; pockets, too.</p>
<p>The thinking is that since supervisors are normally the ones carrying out the actions that make employees sue, they ought to be held accountable themselves.</p>
<p><strong>Wage and hour</strong></p>
<p>In one recent case, a company was sued for failing to pay overtime. The verdict: The company was ordered to hand over $141,000 in back pay.</p>
<p>But it wasn&#8217;t just the employer that got hit hard &#8211; the manager who was in charge of the employees was forced to pay the same amount in punitive damages, since compensation decisions were mostly in his control (<strong>Cite: </strong><em>Chao v. Hotel Oasis, Inc.</em>).</p>
<p><strong>FMLA</strong></p>
<p>A similar case was decided after an employee was fired while taking FMLA leave. Except this time, both her supervisor and the company&#8217;s HR manager were held personally liable.</p>
<p>They tried to have the case thrown out, saying they couldn&#8217;t be sued for the company&#8217;s<em> </em>decision to terminate the women. But the judge didn&#8217;t buy it. As the FMLA says, &#8220;Any person who acts directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer to any of the employees of such employer&#8221; can be held responsible. In other words, as the primary decision-makers, the two managers screwed up and had to fork over the money (<strong>Cite: </strong><em>Spagnoli v. Brown &amp; Brown Metro, Inc.</em>).</p>
<p><strong>Harassment and discrimination</strong></p>
<p>What about discrimination and harassment cases? It depends. As far as federal law goes, the courts have agreed there&#8217;s no individual liability in those kinds of suits.</p>
<p>But the states are a mixed bag. For example, the California Supreme Court recently tossed out a retaliation suit against a manager, citing previous decisions rejecting the idea of personal liability in harassment and discrimination cases.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not true everywhere. In New York, a lawsuit was filed by a woman who claimed she was fired because of her gender. The higher-ups who made the decision to let her go were included as individual defendants. The court let the case go forward, finding that, under New   York law, individuals with &#8220;significant supervisory authority&#8221; can be sued for discrimination (<strong>Cite: </strong><em>Heinemann v. Howe &amp; Rusling, et. al.</em>).</p>
<p>Regardless of where your state falls on the issue, it&#8217;s a threat supervisors need to be aware of &#8211; and it&#8217;s a good way to drive home the importance of paying attention to the law next time you give a training presentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/courts-tell-managers-to-pay-literally-for-mistakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
