HRLegalNews.com » Manager slip-ups lead to big FMLA losses

Manager slip-ups lead to big FMLA losses

May 23, 2008 by Sam Narisi
Posted in: FMLA, Special Report

Of course, you know how to respond to FMLA requests. But you also know managers need to see you when they get a request — and that they don’t always do it.

As HR pros know, employees don’t qualify for FMLA leave if:

  • they work in a location with fewer than 50 employees in a 75-mile radius
  • they don’t have a “serious medical condition,” or
  • they don’t meet the law’s 12-month/1,250-hour requirement.

But too often, managers mistakenly tell those employees they can take medical leave. That can cause huge legal problems later.

In one case, an employee found out she needed surgery. She scheduled the operation and asked her manager for FMLA, which he approved.

While she was gone, HR discovered she hadn’t met the 1,250-hour requirement. When she came back, her job was gone, due to a restructuring that took place while she was away.

Despite not being eligible for leave in the first place, she sued. She claimed her manager led her to believe she was eligible, and she would have rescheduled the surgery for a later date if she knew that wasn’t the case. The judge agreed, and the company lost the case (Cite: Kosakow v. New Rochelle Radiology Associates, P.C.).

Watch those handbooks

Another recent case involved a company with two locations: its main building and a smaller plant that had fewer than 50 employees and was more than 75 miles from headquarters. Employees in both places were given a copy of the same handbook — which included an explanation of FMLA rights that didn’t mention the size requirement.

An employee at the smaller plant took time off for an illness. He never specifically asked for FMLA leave. But apparently, his supervisor didn’t know he didn’t qualify for FMLA and didn’t tell him beforehand that the absences wouldn’t be allowed.

When he came back to work he was fired. He sued, claiming he was led to believe he was eligible for leave, so he couldn’t be fired for taking it. The court agreed (Cite: Myers v. Tursso Co.).

Steps to take now

Education and training is the key to preventing those problems. Two things companies can do to avoid being trapped into offering more than the law requires:

Keep policies up-to-date — It’s important to keep track of who’s covered and who isn’t and give the right policies to the right people. Also, to limit confusion, policies should mention all of the law’s eligibility requirements.

Train managers — Supervisors need to be aware of who’s eligible for leave, since they’re the first point of contact when employees need time off. They should be trained on the law’s requirements and told to bring FMLA issues to HR before approving or denying anything.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , ,

3 Responses to “Manager slip-ups lead to big FMLA losses”

  1. FMLA law Family Medical Leave Act update, Latest cases on FMLA Law : FMLA Law News Update - Memorial Day Says:

    [...] Manager slip-ups lead to big FMLA losses By Sam Narisi Train managers — Supervisors need to be aware of who’s eligible for leave, since they’re the first point of contact when employees need time off. They should be trained on the law’s requirements and told to bring FMLA issues to HR … [...]

  2. Christine Says:

    That’s why there are HR departments. Managers have too many responsibilites to worry about who is eligible for FML and who is not ~ what law pertains to whom.

    In our company if an employee needs time off, the mananger directs them to HR. When the FML is approved, then it’s communicated to the manager. All paperwork and requests go through HR.

  3. Michele Says:

    In the first case, while the employee may not have met all the neccessary qualifications for a FMLA, the company may have a medical/disability LOA policy that the employee may qualify for. This is were a lot of the Managers go wrong, when they are granted a disability/medical LOA, they may not be referring to FMLA or may use the term incorrectly.

    In the second case, while although the employee may work at the smaller location, he is still covered under 1 organization. That is how it is for me. Although I am at a smaller location, the employees here are still recognized as one organization covered by all of the same policies.

    It is not as cut and dry as what is outlined. In these cases, we need to make sure we not only know the FMLA law but what internal processes are also in place such as other leave policies that are still active and possible union contracts that may stipulate some leave rights.

Leave a Reply


advertisement

advertisement