<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t use new I-9 yet: What HR needs to know now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrlegalnews.com/dont-use-new-i-9-yet-what-hr-needs-to-know-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/dont-use-new-i-9-yet-what-hr-needs-to-know-now/</link>
	<description>Up-to-the-minute cases and law impacting HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:01:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melveen</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/dont-use-new-i-9-yet-what-hr-needs-to-know-now/comment-page-1/#comment-5564</link>
		<dc:creator>Melveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=942#comment-5564</guid>
		<description>On the FAQ&#039;s page of the USCIS website, you&#039;ll find the wording about &quot;civil penalties&quot; for using the incorrect version of the I-9 form.  We don&#039;t have to rely only on SHRM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the FAQ&#8217;s page of the USCIS website, you&#8217;ll find the wording about &#8220;civil penalties&#8221; for using the incorrect version of the I-9 form.  We don&#8217;t have to rely only on SHRM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethel</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/dont-use-new-i-9-yet-what-hr-needs-to-know-now/comment-page-1/#comment-5416</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=942#comment-5416</guid>
		<description>The only difference between the forms will be on the back. Some of the documents in List A were too easy to forge. So they removed Form I-688, I-688A, and I-688B from the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only difference between the forms will be on the back. Some of the documents in List A were too easy to forge. So they removed Form I-688, I-688A, and I-688B from the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shari</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/dont-use-new-i-9-yet-what-hr-needs-to-know-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4517</link>
		<dc:creator>Shari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=942#comment-4517</guid>
		<description>Thanks Lisa for the update.  However, how can they fine us when the &quot;recall&quot; didn&#039;t go out until 2-3?? Or at least that&#039;s when I got mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lisa for the update.  However, how can they fine us when the &#8220;recall&#8221; didn&#8217;t go out until 2-3?? Or at least that&#8217;s when I got mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shari</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/dont-use-new-i-9-yet-what-hr-needs-to-know-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4516</link>
		<dc:creator>Shari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=942#comment-4516</guid>
		<description>We started Monday morning using the new forms as we were told to.  I just now opened this email and find out we are not to use them.  I give up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We started Monday morning using the new forms as we were told to.  I just now opened this email and find out we are not to use them.  I give up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/dont-use-new-i-9-yet-what-hr-needs-to-know-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4514</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=942#comment-4514</guid>
		<description>So are we suppose to be using the 2007 or 2008 I9? I threw out all my old ones as well so can someone send me whichever one is considered current?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are we suppose to be using the 2007 or 2008 I9? I threw out all my old ones as well so can someone send me whichever one is considered current?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/dont-use-new-i-9-yet-what-hr-needs-to-know-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4508</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=942#comment-4508</guid>
		<description>I have an email from SHRM on 2/2/09 that states: &quot;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it has delayed by 60 days, until April 3, 2009, the effective date for using the revised Form I-9, originally scheduled to go into effect today.  Please note:  Employers who use the new form prior to the April 3, 2009 effective date are subject to civil monetary penalties.&quot;  Just wanted to make those of you that are currently using the new form aware of the potential penalty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an email from SHRM on 2/2/09 that states: &#8220;The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it has delayed by 60 days, until April 3, 2009, the effective date for using the revised Form I-9, originally scheduled to go into effect today.  Please note:  Employers who use the new form prior to the April 3, 2009 effective date are subject to civil monetary penalties.&#8221;  Just wanted to make those of you that are currently using the new form aware of the potential penalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/dont-use-new-i-9-yet-what-hr-needs-to-know-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4450</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=942#comment-4450</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a perfect example of government red tape and waste....you know like $5,000 hammers and such!  They shouldn&#039;t be telling us something is going to be required until it&#039;s a done deal.  This ended up being an economic stimulus package for papermills and copy machine maintenance companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a perfect example of government red tape and waste&#8230;.you know like $5,000 hammers and such!  They shouldn&#8217;t be telling us something is going to be required until it&#8217;s a done deal.  This ended up being an economic stimulus package for papermills and copy machine maintenance companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/dont-use-new-i-9-yet-what-hr-needs-to-know-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4449</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=942#comment-4449</guid>
		<description>The old forms and the new forms are all at www.uscis.gov under immigration forms -- the I9 is WAYY down the page.

Good Luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old forms and the new forms are all at <a href="http://www.uscis.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.uscis.gov</a> under immigration forms &#8212; the I9 is WAYY down the page.</p>
<p>Good Luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristian</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/dont-use-new-i-9-yet-what-hr-needs-to-know-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4438</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=942#comment-4438</guid>
		<description>I also threw out all old forms and made copies of the new form so I&#039;d be ready on 2/2/09 for seasonal hiring. I always have new hire paperwork mailed out to their homes/schools so they can begin working in April/May. What a waste of paper!! I hope we can still use the 2/2/09 version after April at least...either way it&#039;s quite the inconvenience!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also threw out all old forms and made copies of the new form so I&#8217;d be ready on 2/2/09 for seasonal hiring. I always have new hire paperwork mailed out to their homes/schools so they can begin working in April/May. What a waste of paper!! I hope we can still use the 2/2/09 version after April at least&#8230;either way it&#8217;s quite the inconvenience!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/dont-use-new-i-9-yet-what-hr-needs-to-know-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4432</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=942#comment-4432</guid>
		<description>JR -- 

The change on 6/16/08 was just to update the expiration date on the top of the I9 form -- apparently they now have to expire the forms once a year -- but the revision date at the bottom is 6/5/07.

We&#039;ve opted to have anyone who used the 2/2/09 version on 2/2/09 complete a new I9 form -- Mary -- I feel your pain -- I have 1100 locations -- all of whom had to be asked to go back to the older I9.  

Crazy days

G</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR &#8212; </p>
<p>The change on 6/16/08 was just to update the expiration date on the top of the I9 form &#8212; apparently they now have to expire the forms once a year &#8212; but the revision date at the bottom is 6/5/07.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve opted to have anyone who used the 2/2/09 version on 2/2/09 complete a new I9 form &#8212; Mary &#8212; I feel your pain &#8212; I have 1100 locations &#8212; all of whom had to be asked to go back to the older I9.  </p>
<p>Crazy days</p>
<p>G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

