<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did employee on FMLA have to follow call-in policy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrlegalnews.com/did-employee-on-fmla-have-to-follow-call-in-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/did-employee-on-fmla-have-to-follow-call-in-policy/</link>
	<description>Up-to-the-minute cases and law impacting HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:01:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: None of the above for President</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/did-employee-on-fmla-have-to-follow-call-in-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4790</link>
		<dc:creator>None of the above for President</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=733#comment-4790</guid>
		<description>Our Company makes anybody taking intermittent FMLA leave call in everyday, Someone who may be off for 3 weeks, I usually go strictly by the paperwork. If it states that your off for 3 weeks, I log it on a excel spreadsheet when your return date should be, if you do not return by that day I will be calling you and it is up to you to provide me with the extra paperwork extending their leave. I tell them they have 3 days to provide this information (which in our handbook) it states after 3 days of an unexcused absence or No Call/ No Show you are released.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our Company makes anybody taking intermittent FMLA leave call in everyday, Someone who may be off for 3 weeks, I usually go strictly by the paperwork. If it states that your off for 3 weeks, I log it on a excel spreadsheet when your return date should be, if you do not return by that day I will be calling you and it is up to you to provide me with the extra paperwork extending their leave. I tell them they have 3 days to provide this information (which in our handbook) it states after 3 days of an unexcused absence or No Call/ No Show you are released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Tarmon</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/did-employee-on-fmla-have-to-follow-call-in-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-3662</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Tarmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=733#comment-3662</guid>
		<description>Our employees need to call in on a daily basis when they&#039;re on intermittent leave, not where we&#039;ve granted them a specific length of time off, and I think the former situation applies here as well. The supervisor/manager cannot properly manage his/her department if there&#039;s no awareness of whether or not that employee is going to show up on any particular day. We certainly would not expect our employees on either FMLA or non-FMLA leave to call every day when the return date (or anticipated return date) is already known. 
In this case, however, their company policy had been established, and the employee had been following it. Had she communicated with her manager, and indicated that the policy was a burden based on medical reasons, there may have been some accommodation made. But she didn&#039;t, and she violated policy and the termination was appropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our employees need to call in on a daily basis when they&#8217;re on intermittent leave, not where we&#8217;ve granted them a specific length of time off, and I think the former situation applies here as well. The supervisor/manager cannot properly manage his/her department if there&#8217;s no awareness of whether or not that employee is going to show up on any particular day. We certainly would not expect our employees on either FMLA or non-FMLA leave to call every day when the return date (or anticipated return date) is already known.<br />
In this case, however, their company policy had been established, and the employee had been following it. Had she communicated with her manager, and indicated that the policy was a burden based on medical reasons, there may have been some accommodation made. But she didn&#8217;t, and she violated policy and the termination was appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Roark</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/did-employee-on-fmla-have-to-follow-call-in-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-3577</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Roark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=733#comment-3577</guid>
		<description>Even if the calling each day was a bit extreme, the employee understood the requirement and followed the rule for a time before deciding to stop calling. The employee was at fault.  
I believe the employee should have had a meeting with HR and asked if she could have the requirement amended in her case so she would not have to call in ever day, but as the information in the case does not address this, we can assume she did not.  If the employee has started out not calling every day, a case could be made that she did not understand the limitation, but it seems she did in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if the calling each day was a bit extreme, the employee understood the requirement and followed the rule for a time before deciding to stop calling. The employee was at fault.<br />
I believe the employee should have had a meeting with HR and asked if she could have the requirement amended in her case so she would not have to call in ever day, but as the information in the case does not address this, we can assume she did not.  If the employee has started out not calling every day, a case could be made that she did not understand the limitation, but it seems she did in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abby Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/did-employee-on-fmla-have-to-follow-call-in-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-3572</link>
		<dc:creator>Abby Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=733#comment-3572</guid>
		<description>I agree with Judy, in fact our company requires a person on FMLA to call in once a week and speak to or leave a message with the Benefits Manager.  This keeps the communication open, calling in every day seems more like the company is hoping the employee will slip up or will be to ill to call allowing them to remove this person from their books, kind of sends a silent message to other employees.  If an employee has a tenative return to work from their physician that should be good enough, if they do not return on the date that is on their form and the employee does not notify the company then start clicking down those 3 days of no call no show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Judy, in fact our company requires a person on FMLA to call in once a week and speak to or leave a message with the Benefits Manager.  This keeps the communication open, calling in every day seems more like the company is hoping the employee will slip up or will be to ill to call allowing them to remove this person from their books, kind of sends a silent message to other employees.  If an employee has a tenative return to work from their physician that should be good enough, if they do not return on the date that is on their form and the employee does not notify the company then start clicking down those 3 days of no call no show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LRD</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/did-employee-on-fmla-have-to-follow-call-in-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-3569</link>
		<dc:creator>LRD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=733#comment-3569</guid>
		<description>I was a bit surprised at this call &quot;every day&quot; ruling, too.  FMLA could be someone out for maternity leave...they have their 12 weeks (or whatever part of that they wish to take) and you want them to call every day for three months?  Wow!  What a burden on everyone...the employee and whoever has to track that they DID call every day!  

On FMLA, the forms provide for time periods for checking in and can be adjusted for the specific leave time.  &quot;Every two week&quot; or &quot;3 days before returning&quot; and the form also provides for the &quot;estimated time of return&quot;...so you would have SOME idea when that person should be notifying you.  

So, I agree with Judy that every day is pretty redundant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a bit surprised at this call &#8220;every day&#8221; ruling, too.  FMLA could be someone out for maternity leave&#8230;they have their 12 weeks (or whatever part of that they wish to take) and you want them to call every day for three months?  Wow!  What a burden on everyone&#8230;the employee and whoever has to track that they DID call every day!  </p>
<p>On FMLA, the forms provide for time periods for checking in and can be adjusted for the specific leave time.  &#8220;Every two week&#8221; or &#8220;3 days before returning&#8221; and the form also provides for the &#8220;estimated time of return&#8221;&#8230;so you would have SOME idea when that person should be notifying you.  </p>
<p>So, I agree with Judy that every day is pretty redundant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/did-employee-on-fmla-have-to-follow-call-in-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-3566</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=733#comment-3566</guid>
		<description>It seems like a ridiculous policy.  What about the associates who are unable to call in daily due to the nature of their medical condition?  

The medical certifications for FMLA should be enough.  I don&#039;t know why any company would add to the administration issues at the company by having their LOA associates call in.

We require ACTIVE associates to call in each day they are out.  associates on an LOA are not ACTIVE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like a ridiculous policy.  What about the associates who are unable to call in daily due to the nature of their medical condition?  </p>
<p>The medical certifications for FMLA should be enough.  I don&#8217;t know why any company would add to the administration issues at the company by having their LOA associates call in.</p>
<p>We require ACTIVE associates to call in each day they are out.  associates on an LOA are not ACTIVE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/did-employee-on-fmla-have-to-follow-call-in-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-3563</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=733#comment-3563</guid>
		<description>My company doesn&#039;t have such a requirement to call in every day when on an extended leave.  As an employee I would feel put upon to have to do this every day.  Say I&#039;m out on sick leave and I will be returning to work in 3 weeks - well the company knows when I&#039;m coming back so I have to call every day to say I&#039;m out??  Seems redundant to me.  I certainly believe in keeping the lines of communication open but this seems a little over the top.  Suppose the person is seriously ill or recovering from major surgery and does not have the ability to make that call for several days??

I&#039;m interested in hearing views on this and on whether your companies have this type of policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My company doesn&#8217;t have such a requirement to call in every day when on an extended leave.  As an employee I would feel put upon to have to do this every day.  Say I&#8217;m out on sick leave and I will be returning to work in 3 weeks &#8211; well the company knows when I&#8217;m coming back so I have to call every day to say I&#8217;m out??  Seems redundant to me.  I certainly believe in keeping the lines of communication open but this seems a little over the top.  Suppose the person is seriously ill or recovering from major surgery and does not have the ability to make that call for several days??</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in hearing views on this and on whether your companies have this type of policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FMLA law Family Medical Leave Act update, Latest cases on FMLA Law : FMLA Law News Update Jan. 20</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/did-employee-on-fmla-have-to-follow-call-in-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-3547</link>
		<dc:creator>FMLA law Family Medical Leave Act update, Latest cases on FMLA Law : FMLA Law News Update Jan. 20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=733#comment-3547</guid>
		<description>[...] Did employee on FMLA have to follow call-in policy? &#124; HRLegalNews &#8230; One way companies help curtail FMLA abuse: Hold employees on medical leave to the same absence policies as everyone else. But is it legal? One company&#8217;s &#124;%blog_title &#124; Up-to-the-minute cases and law impacting HR. HRLegalNews.com - http://www.hrlegalnews.com/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Did employee on FMLA have to follow call-in policy? | HRLegalNews &#8230; One way companies help curtail FMLA abuse: Hold employees on medical leave to the same absence policies as everyone else. But is it legal? One company&#8217;s |%blog_title | Up-to-the-minute cases and law impacting HR. HRLegalNews.com &#8211; <a href="http://www.hrlegalnews.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

