<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6 big FMLA changes coming soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrlegalnews.com/6-big-fmla-changes-coming-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/6-big-fmla-changes-coming-soon/</link>
	<description>Up-to-the-minute cases and law impacting HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:01:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/6-big-fmla-changes-coming-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-7484</link>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=311#comment-7484</guid>
		<description>Thats what I was wondering, in addition to everything else required, is it just the months worked now to qualify and not about having the required hours worked that I was told was 1,250 hours had to be worked with in the last 12 months?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats what I was wondering, in addition to everything else required, is it just the months worked now to qualify and not about having the required hours worked that I was told was 1,250 hours had to be worked with in the last 12 months?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/6-big-fmla-changes-coming-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-3560</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=311#comment-3560</guid>
		<description>#4.  Eligibility Standards-does this mean the hours (1650 hours) do not count towards FMLA criteria, just the months?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4.  Eligibility Standards-does this mean the hours (1650 hours) do not count towards FMLA criteria, just the months?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New FMLA regs added to Federal Register &#124; HRLegalNews.com &#124; Up-to-the-minute cases and law impacting HR</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/6-big-fmla-changes-coming-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-2204</link>
		<dc:creator>New FMLA regs added to Federal Register &#124; HRLegalNews.com &#124; Up-to-the-minute cases and law impacting HR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=311#comment-2204</guid>
		<description>[...] The rules are substantially the same as the regs proposed in February, which we covered here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The rules are substantially the same as the regs proposed in February, which we covered here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GES</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/6-big-fmla-changes-coming-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-2056</link>
		<dc:creator>GES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=311#comment-2056</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t had this situation but would be interested in the final outcome if you&#039;re able to share at a later date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t had this situation but would be interested in the final outcome if you&#8217;re able to share at a later date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita Harvey-Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/6-big-fmla-changes-coming-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-2055</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita Harvey-Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=311#comment-2055</guid>
		<description>Yes I am dealing with a Labor Attorney. Wanted to know if someone else has had a similar situation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I am dealing with a Labor Attorney. Wanted to know if someone else has had a similar situation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GES</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/6-big-fmla-changes-coming-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-2054</link>
		<dc:creator>GES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=311#comment-2054</guid>
		<description>Anita - I think it&#039;s time for a labor attorney.  I know a good one, if you need a referral.  Unless you&#039;ve handled EEOC or Human Rights complaints previously, it&#039;s really a good idea to consult with counsel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anita &#8211; I think it&#8217;s time for a labor attorney.  I know a good one, if you need a referral.  Unless you&#8217;ve handled EEOC or Human Rights complaints previously, it&#8217;s really a good idea to consult with counsel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita Harvey-Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/6-big-fmla-changes-coming-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-2052</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita Harvey-Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=311#comment-2052</guid>
		<description>Company is presently being sued by an employee through EEOC for failure to grant a FMLA instead of terminating him for unacceptable attendence after progressive discipline had been exhausted and  
  If I asked an employee who had a attendence problem if they needed to go on a family medical leave and they refused, before I had to terminate them.Once I have terminated them because they did not improve am I subject to any liability under ADA. Because I did not demand that they go on a FMLA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Company is presently being sued by an employee through EEOC for failure to grant a FMLA instead of terminating him for unacceptable attendence after progressive discipline had been exhausted and<br />
  If I asked an employee who had a attendence problem if they needed to go on a family medical leave and they refused, before I had to terminate them.Once I have terminated them because they did not improve am I subject to any liability under ADA. Because I did not demand that they go on a FMLA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GES</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/6-big-fmla-changes-coming-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-2051</link>
		<dc:creator>GES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=311#comment-2051</guid>
		<description>Clarity, yes, some.  But intermittent leave time is still a disaster.  So much employee flexibility you almost have to carry 1.5 people for every position.  Employer has limited &quot;control&quot; or options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clarity, yes, some.  But intermittent leave time is still a disaster.  So much employee flexibility you almost have to carry 1.5 people for every position.  Employer has limited &#8220;control&#8221; or options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate P</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/6-big-fmla-changes-coming-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-2050</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=311#comment-2050</guid>
		<description>Very informative.  Thank you for publishing the Big 6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative.  Thank you for publishing the Big 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike R</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/6-big-fmla-changes-coming-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-2047</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=311#comment-2047</guid>
		<description>Finally, some clarity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, some clarity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

