<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $1.8 million lesson about OT exemptions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrlegalnews.com/18-million-lesson-about-ot-exemptions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/18-million-lesson-about-ot-exemptions/</link>
	<description>Up-to-the-minute cases and law impacting HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:01:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/18-million-lesson-about-ot-exemptions/comment-page-1/#comment-3353</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=561#comment-3353</guid>
		<description>Sorry, no dice. Sounds like she wants the best of both and it cannot be both ways.  Look at her duties and it will be clear where she falls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, no dice. Sounds like she wants the best of both and it cannot be both ways.  Look at her duties and it will be clear where she falls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.hrlegalnews.com/18-million-lesson-about-ot-exemptions/comment-page-1/#comment-3295</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrlegalnews.com/?p=561#comment-3295</guid>
		<description>Is it okay for an administrative employee to be classified as exempt in order to not have to take the mandatory lunch bread (and the time deduction associated with it) and yet to be paid hourly in order to still qualify for overtime pay?

The regulations seem unclear on this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it okay for an administrative employee to be classified as exempt in order to not have to take the mandatory lunch bread (and the time deduction associated with it) and yet to be paid hourly in order to still qualify for overtime pay?</p>
<p>The regulations seem unclear on this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

